Showing posts with label siaa master agent. Show all posts
Showing posts with label siaa master agent. Show all posts

Monday, August 31, 2015

How to Know What Insurance Customers Want

Great article on important things our Tague Alliance member clients and prospects want from us....


How to Know What Insurance Customers Want

By Andrew G. Simpson | August 25, 2015
customers
What do today’s customers want from insurance providers?
They want understanding, interaction, even a relationship. But they vary in when and how they wish to learn, interact and build a relationship.
A word from our sponsor:
Sponsored by: FC Business Intelligence. Click here for more info.
Insurance IoT USA conference and exhibition
 will take place onDecember 1-2, 2015 at the Ritz-Carlton Coconut Grove, Miami. This is the only event focusing on the challenges and opportunities of IoT for the insurance industry. Join 20+ expert speakers and 150+ insurers and secure your place now.
Insurance providers have to understand not only when but also how to best help customers with their needs, Lynn Kesterson-Townes, worldwide commerce marketing leader for IBM,told the Insurance Marketing and Communications Association (IMCA) Annual Conference in Nashville.
Firms that figure out how to serve millennials will be able to capture other customers more easily and keep them, the e-commerce expert said.
According to Kesterson-Townes and research she shared from IBM, the insurance marketing and communication strategies of the past no longer work because insurance customers have changed.
“Obviously, they’re the same people, but the way they want to interact with their insurers is very different these days,” she said.
One way customers have changed is that they are less loyal than customers used to be.
In the past two years, 37 percent of customers of insurers contracted with IBM report that they switched their insurers. This churn rate is rising, it’s up 13 percent over the last few years.
“That’s because we believe that in today’s customer‑activated environment, marketing and communications strategies that used to work are no longer working to sustain retention or to significantly grow the business,” she said.
What Customers Want: IBM’s Kesterson-Townes at IMCA
Powered by InsuranceJournal.tv
Bob and Ann
Kesterson-Townes shared two examples. One was a man, Bob, who had a car windshield claim. He also had a $50 discount coupon that would have helped pay his deductible.
“Except for reasons that no one can understand, the insurer didn’t let the auto glass place accept the coupon. No one’s actually to this day figured out why not. Bob’s still baffled why his insurer wouldn’t let his coupon be used. The auto glass place didn’t understand it. Bob had to pay the full deductible. Guess what else? The auto glass place didn’t lose a customer, but Bob switched insurers,” she said.
The other story was about Ann, whose husband just died in a fatal car accident. She received a condolence letter from her insurance carrier. Unfortunately, in the same envelope Ann also received a letter from the same insurance company informing her that her coverage was being cancelled.
“Unbelievable, right? Unbelievable. How did the marketing and communications department get to this point? Sorry your husband died and oh yeah, we’re canceling your policy! Did they not want to use another stamp? You wonder what was going through the heads of people, right?” said Kesterson-Townes.
According to the IBM consultant, these insurers were not thinking about their insureds at these critical times of interaction.
“That’s what customers are looking for today. They’re looking for an understanding of their personal situation when they’re having an event, when they’ve actually had a change in their own situation, and they’re looking for people to help them cope with it. They’re looking for that from their retailers, from their airlines, and from their insurers,” she said.
Interaction Points
She said today’s customers also expect all of the people they have relationships with to be able to respond in the same way. “Therefore, marketing and communications functions in insurers need to be more nimble, more innovative, and better able to engage with their customers and help their entire ecosystem along as well,” she said.
“They don’t want channels. They want interaction points, and we’ve changed that language on purpose because channels infer a one‑way communication. From me to you, from the insurer… ‘Let me push this product to you.'”
As examples of interaction points Kesterson-Townes cited emails from brokers, face-to-face-meetings, talking to a customer service representative over the phone, and click-throughs on a website, even a comparison website.
“As digitally enabling technologies empower and connect customers more easily with businesses and with each other, a one‑size‑fits‑all marketing and communications strategy no longer works. In fact it’s competitively disadvantageous because what we used to have is an organization‑centered economy and now we have an individual‑centered economy,” the IBM executive told the communications professionals.
Today’s customers are using a variety of web‑based interactions to talk to insurers, she said. In the beginning information and quoting stages, they are using a variety of interaction points and they don’t necessarily purchase where they’re searching, IBM’s research shows. In fact, it shows an 18 percent shift away from personal interaction and toward digital interaction at the beginning.
Personal Touch
But that doesn’t mean personal interaction is dead.
“[A]t the point of purchase, we are still seeing a lot of interaction, whether it’s on the phone or in person with a broker. What does this mean for insurers? Customers are obtaining their information and they’re quoting digitally. Then they’re purchasing a lot of times physically, we would call it,” she said.
She said this means that insurers need to be proficient at omni-channel marketing, at merging the digital and the physical experience so that for the customer it feels like the relationship is “building all along instead of restarting with every new interaction point.”
Due to the ubiquitous connectivity, insurance customers are looking for these “customer‑centric” interactions.
To meet this expectation, insurers need data. “You need to know where your customer is in the decision process. You need to know what’s going on in their lives to be causing this decision to be made,” she said.
Lead with Millennials
She stressed the value in being a leader rather than follower in understanding customers. The best place to lead is with millennials, the most empowered generation, people who are under the age of 30.
“You need to embrace your digital millennials because you can learn a lot from them. Once you get successful working with them you can use those lessons in other areas,” she advised.
She said two‑thirds of millennials are demanding customer digital and physical experiences that are harmonized.
“They want increased transparency. They want to really interact and have a relationship with you. They want an understanding of their personal needs. They want fast responses. They still want advice. But if their needs are not met, they’re even more likely to switch insurers than the rest of us. But they’re looking for value. Notice, I said ‘value’ not price,” Kesterson-Townes told the audience.
“We believe that if you can market and communicate to millennials effectively, you will actually be able to capture all of your customer segments,” she said.
That’s because, like millennials, all insurance customers today want four things.
“They want advice, simplicity, convenience, and value from their insurers, which brings us to trust. After all, insurance essentially started as a social network among like-minded people to share risk. How come most customers don’t trust their insurers?”
She said IBM surveys show that more than half (56 percent) of customers do not trust their insurer and that people with low trust in their insurers are almost 20 percent more likely to switch their providers. “That’s why this is important to you,” Kesterson-Townes told the IMCA audience.
According to IBM, it’s not useful to simply look at demographics or ages to segment today’s customers. Demographics actually offer limited insight into predicting the interaction point preferences, she said.
“How do you know if this customer would prefer to talk to an agent online, would prefer to see an agent in person, or would prefer to interact via email? Will demographics give you that answer? We would say, ‘No. In fact, they don’t.'”
Sometimes, demographics even appear counter-intuitive. For example, the youngest age bracket, those under 24 years of age, are not the most likely to purchase insurance via the Internet, she said. Nor is it the next oldest age group, those 24 to 34. It’s actually people 34 to 44 that are most likely to purchase insurance over the Internet.
“That’s a little counter-intuitive to some people. Some people would think the younger, the more likely.”
Psychographics
If not demographics, then what should insurance marketers rely on to understand customers? IBM thinks psychographics, or segmentation based on customer attitudes, is the answer.
“It’s based on behaviors. It’s based on their needs,” she said. “That is much more indicative of how someone wants tot be interacted with, not just how old they happen to be. ”
She said IBM has found that psychographic segmentation is four times more likely to point to the right interaction point than pure demographic segmentation analysis.
IBM identifies six customer segments, to which it assigns names including Loyal Quality Seeker and the Price-Oriented Minimalist.
Kesterson-Townes profiled three examples of growing customer segments.
Demanding Support Seeker
Susan, 33, is unmarried, an energy consultant, and moving from Seattle to Boston. So she needs car insurance, and also needs insurance for her new house in Boston. And she wants life insurance because she’s going to be adopting a child in Boston.
From a psychographic standpoint, Susan is a “Demanding Support Seeker” in IBM’s segmentation, or as Kesterson-Townes described her, “she’s high maintenance.”
“She acts like a traditional insurance customer. She needs a lot of hand‑holding. She really looks to insurers for advice. She trusts them, but she’s also every bit a person of this age, so she’s a modern empowered consumer,” she said.
This customer is very connected and social media savvy but prefers that all of her interactions be personal, from information gathering all the way through purchase and servicing after purchase.
“Demanding Support Seekers, or these high maintenance ones, have the lowest technology affinity in interaction. They want advice. They want full coverage. They want a one‑stop shop. They want someone on the other end of the phone,” Kesterson-Townes said.
Support Seeking Skeptics
John and Ann Cooke of Los Angeles epitomize the second segment Kesterson-Townes described. John is a 28‑year‑old manager at a large retail store. Ann is a 25‑year‑old nurse at a local hospital. This couple is extremely active on several social media sites, especially Facebook (which Kesterson-Townes says is actually for older people these days).
John and Ann are discussing buying a new car. They’ve done a lot of research on their own. Now they’ve turned to Facebook to seek advice from their friends and family on their experience with three models they are considering.
John and Ann are “Support Seeking Skeptics,” in IBM’s psychographic parlance. Support Seeking Skeptics have a medium technology affinity, but when it comes to social media, they’re “off the charts.”
They don’t feel well‑informed about insurance. They are young and haven’t had a whole lot of experience with it. They don’t trust insurers. They’re looking for advice about insurance at the same time they’re looking for advice about which car to buy.
How they prefer to interact with insurers depends on where they are in the process, according to Kesterson-Townes. For example, when searching for insurance, they want to hear from their peers about their experiences. They don’t want to interact with insurers. But when it comes to purchasing, they will flip to a personal interaction such as telephone or face‑to‑face.
“If you’re trying to sell this kind of group car insurance, for example, make sure you’re Facebook friends with John and Ann’s friends and network in,” the IBM expert advised.
Informed Optimizer
The third fast-growing segment is represented by Dan, a 27 year- old single and very successful video game designer who’s purchasing his first rental property. Dan is an “Informed Optimizer” in IBM-speak. “These guys optimize everything. They want to have the right insurance from the right insurer at the right time,” Kesterson-Townes said.
These customers have a very high technology affinity, they’re highly self‑sufficient, they’re informed, and they’re willing to experiment.
“They seek an optimal priced‑value ratio. Price is important, but they will shop around for exactly what they want,” she said.
They prefer to interact digitally throughout the process if possible, even through purchase and servicing. “They’re comfortable in that world, but because they want the tailored product they demand, they’ll get on the phone if they have to, to get exactly what they need,” she added.
As he researches landlord policies, Dan would be really impressed if an insurer reached out to him while he’s online with an appropriate product offer. If a company actually includes an app that Dan can use to communicate with the insurer throughout the relationship, Dan would be thrilled.
Merging Digital and Physical
While these three segments differ in their needs and preferences, they are all engaging in omni‑channel behaviors. Kesterson-Townes said IBM research shows that 80 percent of insurance customers are already using two or more interaction points for information gathering and quoting process. Twenty percent are already using four interaction points or more. Consumers say they expect to be using four interaction points or more in the near future as they look at insurance.
“Again, now’s a good time to start thinking about merging those digital and physical spaces,” said Kesterson-Townes.
She stressed that personal interaction will remain important. In fact, the highest sales conversion rate is in transactions through personal contact, with about 80 percent, versus 30 to 40 percent conversion on websites.
Seamless Experience
Customers want a seamless experience, involving  every contact that they have with the insurer, so they don’t have to start over providing their information at every interaction. That turns them off, the IBM executive told IMCA.
“Therefore, when they do talk to, let’s say, your call center rep, marketing is no longer about the call center rep getting out the right script and starting to pitch whatever product is the product of the day,” she said. “It really is about understanding what that customer’s talking to you about and being able to take them to the next level. ”
Marketing is about personalizing the experience for thousands, or even millions, of customers.
“Whether you’re responding to a customer in real time or anticipating a need that they didn’t even know they had, today’s insurance marketing and communications functions must exceed expectations to give their companies a competitive edge. It’s not just about speed. It’s about the experience. Every interaction is a moment of truth and moments matter. It’s about delivering relevant experiences at the right time and the right place,” she said.

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

ISO Releases 2014 P&C Insurance Industry Results

Tague Alliance members enjoyed a great 2014 and that was correlated with a solid industry result last year as well.  Below is the text of an article released by ISO on the industry results.



Net income for U.S. property/casualty insurers totaled $55.5 billion after taxes last year, coming as little surprise to experts who had forecast a $50-billion-plus result early this year.
In early January, Robert Hartwig, president of the Insurance Information Institute, gave one of the earliest forecasts of full-year industry income, predicting a figure just over $50 billion, along with a policyholders surplus level of $675 billion and a return on equity of 7.7 percent.
See related article, “Profit Estimated at Over $50B for 2014
The official results published on Tuesday by ISO, a Verisk Analytics business, and the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, showed Hartwig’s surplus forecast was right on the mark. But with net income coming in $5 billion more than expected, industry ROE was actually 8.4 percent.
2014FULLYEARISOPCI
While the 8.4 percent return may have seemed disappointing when compared to the double-digit return of 10.2 percent for 2013, overall net profit came in at the second highest level since the financial crisis—surpassed only by the $63.8 billion profit number for 2013—Hartwig and Steven Weisbart, I.I.I.’s chief economist noted in a commentary about the ISO/PCI results.
In both years, insurers faced low levels of catastrophes but the catastrophe loss tally for 2013 was just a little bit better (lower) than 2014. Direct insured losses from catastrophes for both 2013 and 2014 fell far below 2011 and 2012 levels—among the costliest on record for catastrophe losses, Hartwig and Weisbart said, noting that in 2013, direct insured losses from catastrophes plummeted $22.1 billion to $12.9 billion.
According to the ISO/PCI report, direct insured property losses from catastrophes hitting the U.S. grew $2.6 billion to $15.5 billion in 2014 but this was still $7.2 billion lower than the 10-year average of $22.7 billion.
“Wildfires, winter storms, hail storms, and tornadoes all took their toll, but there was no single event that did enormous damage” in 2014, Hartwig and Weisbart they wrote in their commentary.
“The industry’s performance in 2014 could be considered a return to long-term trends, neither as strongly profitable as in 2013 nor as catastrophe-impacted as in 2011 and 2012,” they concluded.
In addition to modestly higher catastrophe losses, a lower level of investment income played a role in the driving the profit level for 2014 below 2013’s overall result. Investment income—primarily interest payments from bonds and dividends from stock holdings— dropped 2.5 percent to $46.2 billion.
Losses and Premiums Growing—But Not at the Same Rate
On the underwriting side, another highlight from the ISO/PCI year-end figures was the level of net written premiums, which jumped 4.1 and 4.4 percent in 2014 and 2013. Notably, however, the 2014 premium climb did not outpace the increase in total incurred losses, 6.2 percent, and the combined ratio inched up 0.8 points to 97.0 partly as a result of the difference.
Commenting on the 3-point underwriting profit for 2014, Beth Fitzgerald, president of ISO Insurance Programs and Analytic Services, said: “Right now, good underwriting results are a must for insurers. But with much of the improvement in underwriting results for the last two years attributable to moderate catastrophe losses and dependent on continued reserve releases, one has to wonder just how sustainable the net gains on underwriting will be.”
On a net basis (including deductions for reinsurance), catastrophe losses and loss adjustment expenses totaled $16.8 billion in 2014, up 20 percent over the $14.0 billion total recorded for 2013. Non-catastrophe losses totaled $317.9 billion in 2014, up 5.6 percent over 2013.
Lower levels of reserve takedowns during 2014 for losses incurred in prior years explained part of the increase in the industry’s incurred loss total for calendar year 2014. Overall, takedowns amounted to $11.2 billion in 2014, compared to $15.6 billion in 2013. The I.I.I. and ISO/PCI analyses both note, however, that much of the difference between the 2013 and 2014 levels of reserve takedowns (releases) is attributable to mortgage and financial guaranty lines of business. Excluding the guaranty businesses, reserve releases for other lines totaled $10.9 billion in 2014, compared to 12.0 billion in 2013.
Examining the top line, the economists at I.I.I. see continued exposure growth in the year ahead, noting that exposure changes and rate changes are the two determinants of net premium growth.
“Workers compensation is likely to remain among the fastest growing major P/C lines of insurance in 2014 if economic growth and hiring continue as projected,” Hartwig and Weisbart wrote in their analysis.
“With premiums for auto, home and major commercial lines all trending positively, overall industry growth could keep pace with overall economic growth in 2015, as was the case in the prior two years,” they said, noting that new vehicle sales are now back to pre-recession levels, and that residential construction recorded the best yearly numbers since 1999 last year.
“With the pace of real GDP growth expected to quicken in 2015 to nearly 3 percent, personal and commercial lines exposures—and the premiums they generate—should continue to expand modestly,” they said.
Fourth-Quarter Results: Combined Ratio at Record Low
Looking back at 2014, Robert Gordon, PCI’s senior vice president for policy development and research, noted the contribution of good fourth-quarter numbers from underwriting activities. “Property/casualty insurers had another moderately good year in 2014, with fourth-quarter results particularly strong,” he said, referring to net written premium growth of 4.8 percent and a combined ratio that was more than five points better than breakeven.
At 94.9, the combined ratio was the lowest recorded in nearly three decades, according to the PCI/ISO report. The fourth-quarter combined ratio has averaged 106.5 since 1986, the report said.
2014Q4ISOPCI
Net premium growth outpaced the increase in net losses, which was only 2.7 percent in the quarter.
Still, net income fell to $17.8 billion in fourth-quarter 2014, down nearly 14 percent from $20.7 billion in fourth-quarter 2013.
Significant declines in net investment income–a 9.2 percent drop to 11.9 billion–and a $4.1 billion decline in net realized investment gains—drove overall net income lower in spite of better underwriting results.

Sources: ISO, PCI, III
http://www.carriermanagement.com/news/2015/05/26/140387.htm

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Understanding Commercial Property Underwriting and ‘COPE’

Construction, Occupancy, Protection and Exposure (COPE) are the same four basic elements of underwriting data that real property underwriters have used for nearly 300 years.
So what are these time-honored elements? The following paragraphs briefly explain each element of COPE.

Construction (C)

For underwriting analysis, construction is broken down into three sub-parts:
  • Construction materials;
  • Square footage; and
  • Age of the structure.
Construction Materials
Insurance Services Office (ISO) defines six construction classifications (from “1” to “6”) based on the combustibility and damageability of the materials used to construct the structures “major structural features.” The lower the number, the more susceptible the structure is to damage by fire. Construction class codes are a function of the “major structural features”: exterior load-bearing walls combined with roof and floor(s).
Assigning a construction class code is first a function of the load-bearing wall material and secondarily a function of the floor and roof materials. Four exterior, load-bearing wall types are considered along with four floor and roof types. Combining the wall type with one the floor/roof types produces the structure’s construction class.
Mixed Construction Problems
What effect does a combination of building materials and assemblies have on a commercial property’s construction classification? Factually, mixing construction material can be detrimental to the building’s ultimate construction class and loss cost/rate.
Simply, to qualify for a higher construction class rating, the superior construction must equal or exceed 66 2/3 percent of the ratable structural feature. This 2/3 requirement applies first to the walls and separately to the combined area of the floors and roofs.
Square Footage
Structure size influences many aspects of the underwriting process related to the “construction” element of “COPE.” Square footage also factors into the “protection” section of COPE (i.e. the need for a sprinkler system, etc.). But the main aspect of structure size from the underwriting aspect is in the comparison of the building’s “maximum possible loss” (MPL) versus its “probable maximum loss.” (PML)
Essentially, it is “possible” that the entire structure may be destroyed in any one loss; thus the MPL is the entire structure (100 percent). However, the chances that the building will suffer a total loss are inversely proportional to the size of the structure. Basically, the larger the building, the less likely the entire structure will be destroyed in a single event. Thus, the PML percentage decreases as building size increases (subject to the protection (“P”) used in the building).
Age of the Structure
Aging structures create concerns and questions in the underwriter’s mind. Specifically, underwriters concern themselves with the building’s major systems (roofing, plumbing, HVAC and wiring) when underwriting an older structure. The older the structure, the more likely a major system will malfunction, leading to a possible claim due mostly to an internal issue rather than caused by an external force.
Have the systems been maintained and updated as necessary? When were the last updates? What was the extent of those updates? Who did the updates? These are all questions underwriters may ask when evaluating older structures.
Agents should concern themselves with the age issue as well. Many construction-related ordinances and laws may have been updated or enacted since the building’s original construction. Any increased cost related to bringing a structure into compliance with local building codes following a covered cause of loss is specifically excluded in the un-endorsed commercial property policy.
Importance of ‘Construction’ Information
Taken on its own, “construction” may ultimately be the most important element in property underwriting. Although the second element, “occupancy” (what the insured does), is often seen as primarily important among the four elements; occupancy really is secondary to construction when the risk is a class of business the underwriter normally writes.
Granted, construction and occupancy can each be seen as a function of the other in regard to underwriting decisions, often times the decision comes back to construction. For example, an underwriter may offer coverage to a restaurant in a masonry/non-combustible building (construction class “4”); but may not be willing to offer coverage to the same operation located in a joisted/masonry building (construction class “2”).

Occupancy (O)

“Occupancy” information is comprised of two parts: 1) what the insured does; and 2) how the insured manages the hazards associated with what they do. Determining what the insured does is rather simple; determining how they manage their “hazards of occupancy” requires closer investigation (either by the agent, insurance carrier staff, or independent inspection firm).
Each class of insured (retail, office, wholesale, manufacturing, service, etc.) presents its own relative risk of first party property loss. The greater the risk of loss, the more closely the underwriter analyzes the operations (occupancy) and the higher the relational cost of coverage. An office, for example, presents less of an operational hazard than does a paint and body shop; resulting in a lower property occupancy rate factor for the office.
Beyond merely knowing the insured’s operations/occupancy, the insurer must also investigate how the insured manages those operations (part two of the occupancy review). Similar insureds do not necessarily manage operations in the same manner. Since each insured manages its exposures and hazards differently, each has its own “hazards of occupancy” that must be considered in the underwriting process.

Protection (P)

Underwriters and building code officials are often jointly interested in the property protection aspects of structures, but for different reasons. Property underwriters view property protection measures in regards to their ability to lessen the amount of property damage; building code officials generally view protection from a general public and personnel protection angle.
Sprinkler systems, fire extinguishers, alarm systems, fire doors and fire walls, and public fire protection are the primary protection mechanisms evaluated by underwriters. A particular structure’s construction and occupancy may dictate which property protection mechanisms are required or desired by the underwriter.

Exposures (E)

Is the insured property exposed to any external hazards? Not all hazards are related to the insured structure or operation; some come from outside the premises or are simply geographic in nature. A few external exposures relevant to property underwriters include:
  • The insured structure’s proximity to a high-hazard operation;
  • The local wildfire risk;
  • The possibility for damaging winds and/or water;
  • The structure’s flood zone location (located in or near a special flood hazard area (SFHA));
  • The structures earthquake exposure; and
  • The jurisdictions building code requirements.
Understanding COPE fosters better planning during the property underwriting process. Knowing what to provide and why to provide specific information makes the underwriting process smoother and, hopefully, quicker. Also, knowing COPE can assist clients when planning upgrades to current structures or constructing new buildings.

Questions regarding Commercial Property Underwriting and "COPE" can be directed to our Commercial Lines Agency Specialists by calling (760) 201-0923, or visiting our website at www.TagueAlliance.com
By Christopher J. Boggs | February 3, 2015
www.InsuranceJournal.com

Thursday, September 26, 2013

Tague Alliance Brings The Agency Growth Seminar To Member Agents

Tague Alliance is always looking for ways to help our member agencies become more successful preferred independent agents!  We brought in the Agency Growth Seminar to train a number of our members in simple but effective ways to dramatically increase their revenue.  We had a great training session and look forward to seeing positive sales growth as a result of the immediately implementable ideas that were provided to the attendees.

The class size was limited to allow for good interaction and a more personal experience.










Talking shop!  The class took the agents through an agency analysis and then into solutions for growth.








How to maximize cross‐line selling by Taping the income potential of your book of business

Setting the Stage
“Most people already have the knowledge and ability to increase sales results.  What they don’t
have is the knowledge about how to put it all together, manage it and make it happen.”
Scott Channell

The Agency Growth System has four distinct features:

  • A Sales and Marketing System that generates a dependable and reliable source of new business.
  • Simplified Goal Setting
  • How to Tracking and Measure for Results
  • Staff Accountability


Problems and Challenges
Here is the reality of what you face on a daily basis: The average household owns 7.1 policies.
The average agency has a household penetration of 1.9 policies which means 5.2 policies are in some
other agency’s book of business. The numbers don’t get any better when you analyze life and
financial services. On average 1 in 12 households will purchase some form of life or financial
service from someone in the next 12 months. Over the next 7 years, statically, 100% of your book of
business will purchase life or a financial service from someone else.  It isn’t a question of “if”
they leave; it’s a question of “when.”

The problems and challenges that face insurance agencies never seem to change. Every agency has the same basic questions:

  • How can I increase New Business?
  • How can I improve Profits?
  • How can I improve Retention?
  • How can I accomplish all of this with the least amount of effort?


The Solution is Simple
Faced with limited resources and time, The Agency Growth System provides an agency with
ready‐to‐deploy field proven sales and marketing strategies where much of the work is already done
for you, not by you.


  • It is low impact for the staff and the client
  • It is specifically designed to redefine the agent’s role as a Profession Insurance Advisor
  • It focuses on what I believe is our Professional Obligation and that is to ask questions, identify problems and offer realistic solutions
  • It is a systematic and dependable way of producing a steady follow of new business.


The Agency Growth System Workshop

The participants will leave the workshop with a customized “Game Plan”, for their specific agency,
that can be immediately implemented and produce measurable results in days not weeks or months.

Implementation
The Agency Growth System takes the guesswork out of increasing sales and agency profitability by
giving the agency a unified approach to establishing an Agency Sales Culture based on simple easily
implemented strategies.

The sales strategies include:

  • Policy Review / Cross‐line Selling
  • Internet Sales
  • Targeted Markets
  • Life and Financial Services


Agency Growth Systems will provide implementation assistance and coaching for 30 days. We will do
what is necessary to make you successful.

The Philosophy
The philosophy behind the Agency Growth System is simple:    “Stop selling insurance!”

"I believe our Professional Obligation is to ask questions, identify problems and offer realistic
solutions. This means providing client with advice on all of their policies regardless of who
controls them. If we can accomplish this in a professional manner, clients will give you the opportunity to provide the policies they want."  Harlan Warthen

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Tague Alliance - New Office

Hello Everyone....

We have moved our Tague Alliance office to a more functional space and are very excited about the new digs. Our physical address is now: 380 S Melrose Drive, Suite 414 in Vista, CA 92081.

The Tague Team

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Tague Alliance - Focus on Retention

This was a great post from MetLife Auto and Home and Tague Alliance felt that it was worth sharing:


Focus on Retention
As you enter the New Year, take some time to reflect on ways to improve your business model in the coming year. This may include expecting more than others think possible. One area of critical importance is customer satisfaction. Ask yourself, “Is your client the most important person on the premises?” A few simple steps can start you down the road to improved customer service.

5 Simple steps that can make a difference in your retention (by Larry Moffett)

Review your agency's 3-year retention numbers
This simple act will give insight on how your customers view your agency. Is your retention level in the 90 percent range or in the 70’s? The lower the retention percentage, the more probable customer satisfaction is an issue. Often, when we think about customer satisfaction, we think in terms of “over the top” service. That’s great, and a worthy goal to strive for. But, “over the top” service probably won’t happen in most agencies on a consistent basis. What is possible and attainable is for the agency to render service that will resonate with their clients. Generally, this can be achieved with little or no investment. Customer satisfaction is achieved not through programs, but by changing behaviors and attitudes. Customer satisfaction increases when agencies intentionally focus on areas that truly resonate with clients. Educating front-line staff—training and coaching them to adopt skill sets that resonate with customers—pays big dividends.

Determine how your agency measures up

Reliability - if the level of service dependable? Are the clients' concerns addressed and questions answered in a reasonable timeframe?
Assurance - does the service build confidence?
Empathy - do the people giving the service communicate they care?
Responsiveness - are customers needs uncovered and addressed?
Tangibles - pay attention to the things your customers see and feel. Do staff and surroundings appear professional and inviting?

Take control of factors that can influence customer satisfaction
Multi-policy: Customers who have more than one policy with the same agency/company, such as auto and homeowners insurance, are more likely than clients with mono-line policies to be satisfied with their policy offerings. “Bundled clients” renew policies at an 11 percent higher rate than “single policy” clients.
Get it right the first time: Customers are more satisfied when they only have to contact their agent once to resolve an issue. Satisfaction declines significantly with each additional client-initiated contact.
Return calls: When call backs to clients are required, agents who call back as promised get consistent high satisfaction ratings.
Time is critical: Clients who file physical damage claims expect prompt service. Same-day response to the first notice of an accident, followed by a settlement within a week and repairs completed within two weeks, characterize best practice. Some data suggests satisfaction with claims handling drives 44 percent of the overall impression of the insurer.

Policy reviews
Clients who have their policy needs reviewed each year report satisfaction levels that are significantly higher than those who do not. Customer surveys reveal that nearly half of those surveyed report that they have not been offered an annual policy review by their agent. Unless a customer files a claim, offering the client a “risk review” is one of only a few opportunities an agent has to build trust with the customer. Otherwise, the sum of their interaction is limited to paying their bills and reviewing periodic policy changes.

Stay focused and enjoy the benefits
High levels of customer service mitigate price; good service helps shift the focus away from price. Our friends in retail learned long ago that the better the service, the higher the prices they can charge for their products. The bottom line is that happy customers directly equate with agency financial performance. Every customer lost has an impact on the bottom line

Tague Alliance is focused intently on R.P.G. - Retention, Profit, Growth! Growing is made much more difficult when your agency retention is lagging. For every client and policy that you keep, it is one less that has to be found, quoted, and sold.

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Tague Alliance - We Have Been Saying The "Hard Market Is Coming"

Tague Alliance members need to be prepared for what a Hard Market brings: disruption to our books of business, more pressure on carrier appointments and production, a sharper focus on profitability and book quality, and policy rewrites. The Hard Market is disruptive and every few years the insurance cycle shifts. In our estimation, 2012 will be the transition year and possibly very disruptive.

The silver lining is that many more people will be shopping their insurance which creates more new businesses opportunities for our members. On the flip side, proactive client management is the name of the game to ensure you are retaining the majority of your client base.

Be prepared so your agency can take full advantage of the changing market place.

Below is a great article which provides some insight into the first nine months of 2011 and how the industry is doing.

Specialty Insurers Lead Way in 2011, but Industry Underwriting Results Down

NU Online News Service, July 21, 1:41 p.m. EST

Specialty commercial insurers continue to lead the way for property and casualty insurers’ underwriting results for this year’s first nine months, but results overall are down sharply compared to same period in 2010, according to a Fitch Ratings analysis.

Fitch says underwriting results for a group of 47 publicly traded P&C insurers and reinsurers it follows have deteriorated so far this year, posting an aggregate combined ratio of 105.3 compared to 96 a year ago. Fitch adds that 32 of the 47 companies posted underwriting losses for the year’s first nine months compared to 15 companies in 2010.

“These lackluster underwriting results led to anemic profitability for most GAAP filers,” says Fitch. “Fitch’s universe reported an operating profit of $8.1 billion year to date, versus $24.2 billion for the same period in 2010.”

Fitch adds that the group reported a net profit of $9.7 billion during the year so far compared to a net gain of $26.4 billion last year.

Catastrophe losses are partly to blame, with losses for the group more than doubling to $28 billion for the first nine months this year compared to last year. Additionally, realized investment gains are lower, totaling $4.2 billion in the current year so far compared to $5.9 billion in the first nine months of 2010.

While all lines are feeling the effects of the weather and economy, specialty commercial insurers have seen the best results of commercial-lines sub-segments, which Fitch says is a trend that has continued over the past several years. “The group’s aggregate combined ratio rose by 5.9 points to 98.1, but was still the only segment in Fitch’s analysis to produce an underwriting profit,” Fitch says.

The segment benefitted from favorable loss-reserve development, which trimmed 5.9 points from the aggregate combined ratio, but that favorable development is down from the 6.4 points trimmed in the first nine months of 2010.

The benefit of reserve releases across the industry is down for 2011 so far compared to 2010. The overall impact has been 2.8 points trimmed from the industry’s aggregate combined ratio in 2011 compared to 3.5 points in the first nine months of 2010. Fitch says the vast majority of underwriters in its group continued to report favorable development, but the rating agency cites Hartford Financial Services Group and HCC Insurance Holdings as two notable exceptions that saw unfavorable reserve development.

For personal lines, the aggregate combined ratio jumped from 95.7 to 102.4 as the sector was hit by Hurricane Irene on the East Coast and heavy tornado activity and winter-storm losses earlier in the year.

Reinsurers saw their aggregate combined ratio climb to 117.3 from 93.1 a year ago due to first-half catastrophes such as earthquakes in New Zealand and Japan, Australian floods and U.S. storms. Reinsurers did report a third-quarter underwriting profit, Fitch says, as Hurricane Irene losses centered more toward primary writers.

Commercial diversified insurers’ combined ratio is 104.6 for the year so far, compared to 96.6 at this time last year. Fitch says only two insurers in its group for this sector—ACE Ltd. and Hartford—produced accident-year combined ratios under 100.

Pointing to trends over the year so far, Fitch says capital generation is at a standstill, loss reserve releases are moderating, catastrophe losses are compounding and there has been a sharp drop in return on capital. However, Fitch notes that signs of a pricing shift have materialized.

“Fitch Ratings believes that this price reaction is well overdue,” the rating agency says, “but it remains unclear if momentum will hold for further pricing improvement that is necessary to return the broader market to adequate return on capital levels.”